Can someone talk to Jerry and find out if he's interested at all in
running the BOTE? Once we have a clear indication of which SysOps
would be interested, then it might be an easy to figure out where to
run it...
Also, Talon's suggestion on a BOTE, conclusion sounds quite
reasonable.
-Timbo.
--- In tradewars_2002@y..., "timborulz" <timbo@a...> wrote:
> --- In tradewars_2002@y..., "Col Sanders" <colsanders@b...> wrote:
> > Heheh... If Mac really keeps FEN closed, I would be willing to
run
> BOTE. I
> > had hoped Mac would stick around and run it indefinitely, but I
am
> prepared
> > to run it otherwise. Don't know if Jerry wants it or not, it
> really is a
> > huge amount of work to run a game that big. I guess Jerry and I
> can arm
> > wrestle over it or something <G>.
> >
> > Col Sanders
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian Massey" <brianmassey@e...>
> > To: <tradewars_2002@y...>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: [tradewars_2002] Re: Bote 2001
> >
> >
> > > It seems to me that nobody is claiming "ownership" of the
BOTE,
> so no one
> > > can just step in and make a decision.
> > >
> > > I have no idea what the best way to determine it will be, but
I
> think
> > there
> > > are only a few servers that have ANY possible claim to hosting
> BOTE 2002.
> > >
> > > In no particular order...
> > >
> > > Fament, if Mac turns the TWGS back on
> > > -- because no single winner could really be decided
> > >
> > > Coastgames
> > > -- because Corp 10 "probably" tied for first place
> > >
> > > Chicken Coop
> > > -- because Corp 13 "probably" tied for first place
> > >
> > >
> > > As it stands now, Fament is down and Coastgames already has a
> major
> > > tournament, Chess (which is fantastic by the way). Chicken
Coop
> looks like
> > > the logical choice to me. Of course, I am biased.
> > >
> > > Cherokee
> > > The Lost Traders Tavern
> > > http://tavern.homeip.net
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hekate [mailto:hekate@t...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:01 PM
> > > To: tradewars_2002@y...
> > > Subject: RE: [tradewars_2002] Re: Bote 2001
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll second that
> > >
> > > about how I would place the game anyway
> > >
> > > but BOTE 02 should still be hosted at terra.playtw.org <G>
> > >
> > > cuz..what other sysop really wan'ts the headaches of the TW
> players?
> > >
> > > Hekate
> > > hekate@t...
> > > ICQ: 10370329
> > > MSN: twhekate
> > > http://www.twlinks.com
> > > http://www.playtw.org:90
> > > telnet://terra.playtw.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Talon Karrde [mailto:dab315@p...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:16 AM
> > > To: tradewars_2002@y...
> > > Subject: Re: [tradewars_2002] Re: Bote 2001
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, not that anyone seemed to care before, but the Cloud 9
> proposal
> > still
> > > stands.
> > >
> > > 1st Place: Corps 10 / 13
> > > - The two strongest and most active during the final years,
> erm.. months
> > of
> > > the game. Let them argue where the game is to be played next
> year, if at
> > > all.
> > >
> > > 2nd Place: Corps 21 / 3
> > > - We initially offered to take second place because the game
was
> in
> > > stalemate mode and we didn't want to wake up at 7am anymore.
It
> still
> > suits
> > > the result because both us and corp 21 were able to hold off
> everyone else
> > > even if it was difficult to gain ground.
> > >
> > > I believed and still do believe that's the fairest possible
> result
> > > considering the level of activity and dedication shown by all
> the teams.
> > If
> > > the game were to be decided by LAST years rules, we'd win
> because we have
> > > the most remaining players that aren't <ship destroyed> but
> last rules
> > were
> > > obviously not fair to everybody because I ended up getting
third
> place to
> > a
> > > stardock camper with one death.
> > >
> > > That's my suggestion in case someone has a better idea.
> > > -TK
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "bdavey3619" <davey@c...>
> > > >Reply-To: tradewars_2002@y...
> > > >To: tradewars_2002@y...
> > > >Subject: [tradewars_2002] Re: Bote 2001
> > > >Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 07:56:32 -0000
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
_________________________________________________________________
> > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > tradewars_2002-unsubscribe@e...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > tradewars_2002-unsubscribe@e...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > tradewars_2002-unsubscribe@e...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]