that image is dot-accurate :) you can easily do image processing on it to
attain the correct size.
-Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Damien Good" <d_good@...>
To: <gbadev@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [gbadev] Re: e-Reader dissection


> Pretty much. The dots should have some white space between them. Also,
> can you provide me that same image, but in 1200 DPI, length = 7.3cm, width
=
> 0.3cm? My printer is capable of 1200 dpi. The lengths/widths need to be
> 7.3/0.3cm, because that is what the real dot code length/widths are. The
> difference in not detecting, and getting read error resides from that fact
> alone.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Schuerewegen" <Tim.Schuerewegen@...>
> To: <gbadev@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:53 PM
> Subject: RE: [gbadev] Re: e-Reader dissection
>
>
> > > Maybe you could write something to output a higher quality error
> > > free dot code image, that might actually print and work. Scanning
> > > introduces errors that most likely affects the ability to print
> > > the dot codes, so that they work.
> >
> > An error free dot code image? You mean something like
> > http://users.skynet.be/firefly/gba/e-reader/slp100.bmp :)
> >
> > Btw, I printed it on a label using my Seiko SLP-100 thermal label
printer
> > (203 DPI) but, as suspected, the e-Reader did not recognise/see it. Will
> try
> > on my Epson 460 Inkjet printer once I have refilled the ink (messy job
> with
> > a needle & stuff). At times like these I wish I had bought the Dymo
label
> > printer (300 DPI) instead.