Hello Bob,

Saturday, March 02, 2002, 12:38:01 AM, you wrote:


>> JQP> IIUC, it's actually slightly lower - 59.72 hz, I believe.
>> That's from
>> JQP> memory, though, so that number might not be right. Can
>> anyone confirm?
>>
>> i'm pretty much sure its faster than 59.72hz ;=))))))))))))))

BK> Actually, John was correct (well, it's 59.727Hz. :)

in theory, yes ofcoz :o)

--
Best regards,
groepaz mailto:groepaz@...