> JQP> IIUC, it's actually slightly lower - 59.72 hz, I believe.
> That's from
> JQP> memory, though, so that number might not be right. Can
> anyone confirm?
>
> i'm pretty much sure its faster than 59.72hz ;=))))))))))))))
Actually, John was correct (well, it's 59.727Hz. :)
-- Bob
One Man Band
http://www.onemanband.com